gnu/linux user space phones please hurry!

Why? He was relatively contemporary and lived a pretty normal life relative to most of us compared to the historical figures.

That and he was a mega sexist who made the lives of women in science much worse for literal decades.

https://youtu.be/TwKpj2ISQAc

Will probably make the price go up. The whole reason why they do this crap is to get more money out of the consumer.

Makes sense. Like only paid employees or dedicated cult members would produce such a recommendation chart. Brave Translate but no DeepL? Brave Talk but no Jitsi? Crazy.

Firefox has built in LOCAL translation but no mention of that. 🤷‍♀️

Brave is a cult.

Brave is specifically a crypto based advertising company cult.

Crypto bros reskinned chrome, added some built in plugins, added their own crypto advertising tokens, and went all queerphobic.

Somehow a few people decided to build their identity around this. Anytime your bring up tech with them they try to sneak their cult-y Brave stuff in. It’s worse than MLM people at this point.

This guy is just sealioning you.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning

From the article you cited. Did you read it?

Unlike traditional AI-assisted coding or pair programming, the human developer avoids micromanaging the code, accepts AI-suggested completions liberally, and focuses more on iterative experimentation than code correctness or structure. Karpathy described it as “fully giving in to the vibes, embracing exponentials, and forgetting that the code even exists.”

Yes you can.

Classic European flavored racism. Are you aware that you are promoting racism or not? I think mindfulness is key here. People should consider their own internal biases and adjust to help make a better world.

Strong recommend for learning the swipe motions. It takes a few min to learn but it’s free real-estate after that. And it’s faster. At least for me.

And the easy retort to that is that they don’t apply Chinese censorship globally. Only in China. Regional laws only apply regionally.

Exactly this. The people who designed secure boot and TPMs were not idiots. You can’t trick a properly set up TPM configured with secure boot in any realistic setup.

It won’t refuse to boot. It’s just that any automatic metric based decryption won’t work.

If you are using a TPM to automatically unlock luks and also manually removed the password backup before hand you could lose your data forever. That is true.

But if you kept the password based decryption stuff you could still manually unlock stuff. Just like secure boot was never there.

The difference would be that there could be no secure attestation that the kernel count trust/use without secure boot.

Like secure boot is really cool on Linux if you learn about it. Like sbctl alone is great for verifying backups and stuff.

I recommend reading through the arch wiki if you want to learn more. It covers a lot of stuff. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_Interface/Secure_Boot

It won’t brick your system forever??? You just turn it off in your bios. Then you have no secure boot. Just like it was never there.

If you don’t care about boot chain attacks it isn’t bad at all.

If you do care about boot chain attacks it’s bad because it allows someone to replace things like the efi binaries, grub, or your kernel with backdoor-ed versions and there would be no way to detect this from the running system.

Secure boot checks for this stuff. You can read more here:

https://access.redhat.com/articles/5254641

You can but then you don’t have secure boot.

Not really. Imagine they replace the ssh binary with a back doored version. Home directory encryption protects your data but not your system.

You can if you want to. But I don’t think that is best practice. The idea of quadlets is the bring Linux norms to containers. You contain and manage all permissions for that container in that user.

I personally have completely separated users and selinux mls contexts for each container group (formerly docker compose file) and I manage them thusly. It’s more annoying but it substantially more secure.

This being said I think you can do it as root. I think this might work but I am not certain sudo systemctl --user -M theuser@ status myunit.service

Are you placing your service files in ~/.config/containers/systemd of the home dir of the user you want them to run as?

Here is a link: https://linuxconfig.org/how-to-run-podman-containers-under-systemd-with-quadlet

Not true. I run them rootless on my server as we speak. :)