You reviewed all the instances of officers getting stabbed pretty quick, what a coincidence that it confirmed your claim.

My argument regards police responding to an armed person, where they have the time and space to control the confrontation.

And even with your hand waving of officers being stabbed you concede that officers have been stabbed when they follow your special method.

It’s not as effective as you think it is. Just google London police officer stabbed.

Do people become stab proof when they swarm someone with a knife?

Michelle Obama tried to encourage better eating habits the Republicans attacked her.

Part of her plan would have banned Cheerios in schools because of added salt. That was one of the things getting pushback.

Her initiative to get added sugars listed on nutrition labels had very broad support.

Do overtakes when someone’s in the pit count?

You risk losing positions with your 2nd driver by protecting your 1st. I’m not sure other teams didn’t think about it, they may not have seen the benifits.

The extra stop just highlighted how terrible Monaco is.

The issue with Wikipedia is it is not a good source of accurate information. Professors would tell students the references on Wikipedia were where to find reputable information but don’t trust the articles.

Professors need to adjust to teaching kids in the Ai world. Relying on take home assignments to gauge how well students understand the material will not work anymore.

All that law is saying is that that specific law does not grant the President authority to regulate, it does not supersede any laws that do grant Presidential authority to regulate imports.

Tarrif authority granted to the President was done by the 1934 Trade agreement act, 1963 trade expansion act, and the 1974 Trade act. They give the President authority to impose tarrifs, for nantional security, nantional emergencies, or unfair trade practices. Even in those cases Congress has the ability to limit the president’s power to impose tarrifs as they have the ultimate authority outlined in Article 1 section 8 of the constitution.

I think they’re hoping the change will make taking an extra stop less costly, we could see more cars charging through the field with fresh tires. The problem is that if you make the pit stop cost too low everyone will come in and there will be no differing strategies.

Fast cars are spectacle, slow heavy ones are not. It’s why semi truck racing ia less popular than f1.

It’s not lack of resources that causes FE cars to be so much slower than F3 cars it’s the batteries. F1 budgets are a tiny fraction of the R&D being spent on batteries.

If you told teams they had 200kg min for fuel, engine, motor, and battery and left the rest up to them teams would not be using motors and batteries. From a racing pov they slow the car down.

The electric motor has been around longer than the combustion engine, there’s no major breakthroughs to be had there either. The only piece that to innovate on are batteries. Currently batteries are not energy dense enough for f1, fe cars are slower than f3 cars.

Technology making cars faster is what f1 is about. The v10 made 1,000 hp and weighed 120kg, the motor & engine in today’s cars make about 1,000hp but weigh close to 200kg when battery, motor, and engine are considered.

The v10 may be dead as a passenger engine but for a race engine it’s still superior.

Electric motors and batteries have less performence per kg compared to an engine and fuel. If rules were changed and teams were allowed 300KG for an engine, fuel, motor, and battery you’d see teams use motors and batteries even less than then they do now.

Selling Ferraris at huge markups to have a v10 engine in it seems like a good reason. They could call it the Le Ham.

F1 cars weigh 800kg without fuel. Fully fueled, they’re heavier than FE cars.

Current f1 cars with heavy hybrid systems are. F1 cars without those weight 605 kg.

You will like NASCAR they use heavy cars and pass each other back and forth all the time.

Then follow one. F1 clearly isn’t for you then. Good bye.

F1 is getting lighter, once they get rid of the fat pig hybrid system they be much lighter.

OK, cool. Still not 300kg more than a FE car like you claimed. Seems your source is a donkey.

I see you’re bad at math 856 - 605 = 251 which is nearly 300kg.

My source is Mario Illien. If Mario misspoke, send a letter of complaint to:

Got caught in a lie, claim someone else told you that but don’t give a source.

Anyhow: FE has no problem producing exciting races with actual overtakes in Monaco.

If overtakes are your metric for a good car than NASCAR cars are for you, they have hundreds of overtakes at Daytona.

His approach for a change this is fully electric propulsion with a very simple and much much lighter ICE as generator and relatively few battery cells. This is somewhat similar to the approach of Audi RS Q e-tron.

I personally prefer fast light cars but if the nissian leaf racing league is your jam more power to you.

Formula 1 2025: Minimum weight WITHOUT driver and fuel: 800kg (Source)

1st 800kg is with the driver source

2nd I’m not using the minimum weigh of an F1 car with the heavy pig hybrid system, that weight is 605kg. Source

The lie is that the hybrid system in its current form is what makes F1 cars heavy. That’s factually not the case. It’s 20kg out of 800kg.

Was this where you got that claim. ES weight is 20-25kg, 7 kg min for the mgu-k and ERS min of 30.6, that doesn’t include extra weight in transmission for hybrid system, wiring, ES safety system, or extra weight for battery and mgu-k mounting.