

Any that refuse to comply with legal requirements won’t be around for long so it is hard to have a list of them or rely on them.
Any that refuse to comply with legal requirements won’t be around for long so it is hard to have a list of them or rely on them.
Proton runs IPv6 6 through a nat and properly blocks incoming connections so that is not a problem here. Also while it isn’t the default on all routers it is still entirely possible for the router to have a firewall on IPv6 connections so no incoming connections can connect to your devices unless you have allowed it.
Are you sure it is the ipv6 setting causing problems? Did you test multiple servers? Proton only supports routing ipv6 through the vpn not connecting with ipv6 so nothing about the connection to the server should be different. It is possible that proton has a bad ipv6 config on one of the servers or ipv6 on your device is setup incorrect.
It depends on the application used as some show cached as used and some don’t. But it is being more common to not show cached as used.
It is definitely better when they still have a proper versioning system and it is unfortunate that many handle it poorly even outside of subscription programs.
I can see how subscriptions are very helpful to handling expenses on the business side especially for any program that operates in a way that security updates are important. But far too many companies have set the price way to high and hid it with a short time so it looks cheap. If yearly was the default length and was reasonably priced then I would be fine with them but $5 a month for a lot of things that could easily be $5 a year is too much.
depends on if you are commonly cpu limited or not. If you are having performance drops from the cpu not keeping up then go with 16gb 3600Mhz to get a little more performance. If you never are being cpu limited then the extra ram would be better as it will be used for caching to help load times and reduce the chance of fps dips related to loading assets
I would say it still counts as 2fa just shifting what is verifying you to your password manager and using the site password and 2fa as a way to verify the password manager with the site. If setup right they would have to have the database and your password to decrypt it not just one or the other and for password managers that sync the database it should require your password and 2fa to sync to a new device so it can’t just be freely grabbed. If that doesn’t count as 2fa then I would like to see an argument about how okta signing you into sites counts as 2fa as it is basically the same thing.