They don’t need to produce a warrant. Please direct your outrage correctly.

“Section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act provides ICE officers the authority to arrest aliens without a judicial warrant.”

This has always been the case. It’s not Russia, it’s not Trump, the outrage should be directed at the “Immigration and Nationality Act” but I guess when Biden or Obama were President it was OK?

Been that way since at least 1990. So, um, when Obama was the Deporter in Chief, I don’t remember people jumping out of their skins like now?

Imagine not being able to blame Russia this time? FUCK indeed.

Watch him discover a Jewish grandmother and invoke the right to return, and poof safe!

That “royal family” reads like the family tree on Oz.

That’s called middle age. You’re on!

Old sci-fi assumed progress in the physical world, of endless progress in speed or materials.

Instead we got near endless progress in the processing of information while we live in houses made of trees, drive cars on rubber tires, and eat animals. Much like before. Sure, we have jets, but even they work pretty much the same way as 50 years ago. Incremental progress, sure, but no warp drive, eh?

Then we’d still have a home grown defense industry with Avro Arrows in museums and not wrecking yards.

But hey, now is a uniquely unique time in history, never before have we seen such things.

It’s great showmanship. It’s a lot of festive noise and music to point fun at the dying empire.

It’s just for show. It also means BRICS is a thing. The US is finished. Now, can someone point me to cheap land in North Carolina?

The Russia is doing it on a far smaller scale. The US does it so often it’s boring.

See: how many military bases the US has around the world. See also: how Hawai’i became a state. But The Russia bad.

Please name a Russian law applicable in the United States?

Also see: the ICC. Also see: The Hague Invasion Act.

Countries apply, well, ONE country, laws outside themselves all the fucking time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far-left_politics

Historically, violence has been widely accepted by the far-left as a means to enact societal change.[262] The anti-authoritarian far-left may consider violence justified in combatting repressive forces.[73] Revolutionary far-left groups might organise themselves into underground movements or carry out violent insurgencies. Insurgencies are only viable in developing nations where the state is not capable of defeating the group.[263] As support for the far-left decreases, violent groups shift their focus from attacks against the state to attacks for survival, such as freeing its members from prison.[201] Leon Trotsky rejected the use of violence, saying it does not benefit the working class like other measures such as striking.

See: Pol Pot

Doctors try to save everyone, even the 0.01%. Hell, the 0.01% are actually a huge focu**s.

BULLSHIT

And you’re about as dense as neutronium if you don’t get it.

The far right wants people to die because they are not in the in-group.

And your evidence for this is?

Sorry, you lost me, I have no idea what anything you wrote after “latinoamerica”. Even that I’m not sure what it means.

Correct. And when the mean terrorists suddenly become useful to you, declare them a splinter faction, take them off the terrorist list, put them in a suit and warmly receive them when they visit your presidents.

I see, so only the far right exists. Interesting. And the far right is so threatening yet seen as corny. Even more interesting.

I’ve noticed there is only ever a far right, never a far left.

It is a comedy by Mike Judge. It is quite entertaining.