Limited to early testers for now, but coming to the public soon.

  • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    How do you propose you sanity check numbers beyond checking whether or not they’re within a sane range, i.e. a hardcoded limit? It’s not like you can trust a monitor that’s potentially feeding you bad values to limit the number of bad values it gives you.

    • Redjard@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I can though.If all the profiles are garbage it’s beyond saving anyway, a single outlier can be ignored.

      • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If all the profiles are garbage, then:

        • it would be bad UX to start using one of the garbage profiles and declare that the monitor’s now working.
        • it would be better UX to notice all the profiles have nonsensical values, fall back to a basic one all monitors typically support, and display an error message.