Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 8 days agoWell that's a reviewlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square66linkfedilinkarrow-up1196arrow-down126
arrow-up1170arrow-down1imageWell that's a reviewlemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 8 days agomessage-square66linkfedilink
minus-square🦄🦄🦄@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up128arrow-down5·7 days agoGender affirming care for cis people seems to be accepted way more easily.
minus-squarebrucethemoose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·6 days ago Gender affirming care for ultra-rich. Fixed that for you.
minus-squareOnomatopoeia@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34arrow-down1·7 days agoHahahahahaja No, no, this isn’t “accepted”, she has money.
minus-squareCarbonIceDragon@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up57arrow-down1·7 days agoI mean, it accepted in the sense that entire governments aren’t trying to forbid her from using public bathrooms over it.
minus-squarebrucethemoose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·6 days agoThat’s because she has money.
minus-squareEarthman_Jim@lemmy.zipBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 days agoNope. You’re missing some key social dynamics in your assessment.
Gender affirming care for cis people seems to be accepted way more easily.
Fixed that for you.
Hahahahahaja
No, no, this isn’t “accepted”, she has money.
I mean, it accepted in the sense that entire governments aren’t trying to forbid her from using public bathrooms over it.
That’s because she has money.
Nope.
You’re missing some key social dynamics in your assessment.