• null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Everyone knows that, but the comment you replied to explains why anything else just isn’t feasible.

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      An laser printer is just a reverse scanner. It’s basically a resin printer with toner. We’re well past those being diy doable. It’s a couple of wires to deliver a charge to the drum and paper, a laser to remove the charge from the drum for the image, and a reservoir for the toner for the drum to pick up. The most complex part is the laser and mirrors for alignment, which is well into hobby diy territory.

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ok, well… we’re all looking forward to you publishing the repo for an opensource laser printer then I guess.

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Don’t be a douche. I’m just saying it’s less complex than it seems and if 3d printers can figure out open spurce, this is comparable.

          • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Honestly, I don’t really have any idea how a laser printer works beyond the basics.

            However, someone has invested the time to create an opensource inkjet printer. It’s a fair assumption that firstly, they know more about printers and hardware than either of us and secondly, they also know everyone prefers laser printers.

            Those two assumptions lead me to the conclusion that there’s a significant barrier to producing an opensource laser printer of which you’re not aware.

            My comment, although unnecessarily douchey, was an allusion to the age old refrain of open source enthusiasts everywhere: if the project isn’t good enough for you, fork it and make your own.

    • ngdev@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      thank you, representative speaking on behalf of everyone, for telling me what the comment i replied to says

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago
        • I want to shit out gold instead of turds
        • sure but that’s not possible
        • yeah but I could be rich
        • ok dumbass
        • thank you, representative speaking on behalf of everyone …
        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          what if you only shit a tiny amount of gold, and had to sift that out of daily turdage?

          what percentage would still send you back into gold-panning the turds of what you ate yesterday?

          these are the questions that keep me up at night.