• VampirePenguin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I’m so sick of all of the performative grandstanding. Grab this fucker and throw him in a deep hole. Nice walkout guys, you really showed him.

  • F_State@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Cool but have those countries ended trade with Israel? Declared sanctions? Sent military aid to the PLO? Establish a no-fly zone? I’m glad this happened, its a start, but it’s not enough and Gaza is running out of time.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Imagine a world where the US respected the International Criminal Court and this man was arrested the minute he set foot on American soil.

    • thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Ok, so hear me out. The ICC is a UN body. The UN headquarters is international soil. Why couldn’t the UN security services arrest him and send him to stand trial at the ICC?

      • Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Because of this the American Service Members Protection Act

        The act gives the president power to use "all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any U.S. or allied personnel being detained or imprisoned by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court.

        This authorization led to the act being nicknamed “The Hague Invasion Act”, since the act would allow the president to order military action in The Hague, the seat of the ICC, to prevent American or allied officials and military personnel from being prosecuted or detained by the ICC.

        The subsection (b) specifies this authority shall extend to “Covered United States persons” (members of the (“Armed Forces of the United States”), elected or appointed officials of the United States Government, and other persons employed by or working on behalf of the United States Government) and “Covered allied persons” (military personnel, elected or appointed officials, and other persons employed by or working on behalf of the government of a NATO member country, a major non-NATO ally including Australia, Egypt, Israel, Japan, Argentina, the Republic of Korea, and New Zealand).

  • Mrkawfee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    By contrast the wanted war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu received over FIFTY standing ovations when he addressed the US Congress last year.

  • EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    1 day ago

    Apparently, Israel hacked phones in Gaza to blast out Netanyahu’s speech as he was giving it. If that had happened in the Superman movie, the audience would have said that’s a bit too comic book villainous.

    • blave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Half of them probably fell asleep about 20 minutes into his insane rant

      • logicbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        2 days ago

        Twenty minutes is about how long a normal person can be reasonably expected maintain attention, even if the content is interesting. That’s why TED talks are 20 minutes long.

        On the other hand, Trump’s rants are mind numbing. You’re either seriously trained at listening, or you have something wrong with your brain, if you can listen to him for more than 2 minutes without zoning out.

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    2 days ago

    It would be great if they all just recognized Palestine as a country and cut all trade with Israel immediately until they stopped. Instead of a symbolic walk out, actually walk out of their lives… And you can verify if they cut their shit out

      • zqps@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        lol no way in hell they’re gonna give up their permanent Security council seat, that would be the best thing they could ever do for the UN

        • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          or it might mean that the UN would no longer serve a purpose because it wouldn’t have any influence over the belligerents

      • TheRealKuni@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because there need to be reasons to participate in society properly. If it’s “we’re cutting you off from all trade and never restarting it,” there’s no incentive for them to change their behavior. Sanctions always give a reason.

        Punishment isn’t a good motivator of human behavior, reinforcement is.

        • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The starving peasant, outside the class system is the first among the exploited to discover that only violence pays. For him there is no compromise, no possible coming to terms; colonization and decolonization is simply a question of relative strength.

          • Frantz Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth

          For the starving people of Gaza, who have lived their entire lives in what amounts to the world’s largest concentration camp, the time for “changed behaviour” from Israel is long passed, if it was ever there to begin with.

          • kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Great, we can keep being perpetually blood feuding with eachother for all eternity, great solution, once we’ve exiled and eradicated all hateful people the remainder will live in peace and prosperity forever.

            (It’s not like that thinking isn’t basically how we got here or anything)

            • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Great, we can keep being perpetually blood feuding with eachother for all eternity, great solution, once we’ve exiled and eradicated all hateful people the remainder will live in peace and prosperity forever.

              This is not Fanon’s point, nor is it mine. The Wretched of The Earth Is a seminal text on colonialism for good reason. In it, Fanon is grappling with what it means for the colonized to violently resist.

              The settler state is already violent. We just don’t usually conceive of state violence as such. Fanon is correct in the same way that the way to deal with a schoolyard bully is to stand up and confront him. Not appeal to his better angels.

              (It’s not like that thinking isn’t basically how we got here or anything)

              This misunderstands the situation. This isn’t some ancient conflict where both sides are equivalent. The Israeli state is the aggressor here, and that aggression has a clear beginning, with at least the Nakbah.

              The land itself is the thing being fought over. Not some nebulous blood feud. The land, the capacity to live on it, work on it, cultivate it, to have history on that land. These are things being denied to the native Palestinians by the Israeli state.

              The solution here is the right of return for all displaced Palestinians, restoration of their civil liberties, language rights, etc. So they might be able govern themselves, as they see fit.

              For a colonized people the most essential value, because it is the most concrete, is first and foremost the land: the land which will bring them bread and, above all, dignity -The Wretched of The Earth

            • 3abas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              What we are asking for is not violence, what we are asking for is a free Palestine for all its citizens, regardless of religion. We want the religious ethno-supremacist state built on our stolen land to become free.

              We aren’t asking for blood, and we aren’t asking to exile or eradicate anyone.

              (It’s not like that thinking isn’t basically how we got here or anything)

              You’re blaming two years of genocide on a single act of violent resistance. How we got here is 500 of our villages destroyed, many massacres against our people, 700 thousand of us expelled from our ancestral homelands, and 77 years of oppression and shooting our kids while calling us animals and snakes.

              History will reflect October 7 as the Gaza ghetto uprising that it was, violent resistance to 75 years of dehumanizing us and colonizing our land, and 16 years of military siege on our people in Gaza.

              Imagine telling Jews in WW2 they should have died peacefully because resisting violently is how we got here.

        • SalaciousBCrumb@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Israel should not be coming back, it needs to be replaced by a country representing the indigenous land owners and not European colonisers.

            • F_State@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Some Israelis are living in the land of their grandfathers but most of them have countries of origin they can be returned to. If that would be bad for them, there’s always countries they can emigrate to. But most solutions that aren’t zionist or “two state” are along the lines of “abolish the ethnostate and replace it with a real democracy” in which case the people currently living in Israel (minus those guilty of crimes against humanity) largely go about their lives as they did before.

              • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Reminds me of how they’re sending people packing in the US. At what point are you allowed to stay on the land

          • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Jews believe they are the indigenous land owners. That’s what this whole thing is about.

            • Sonicdemon86@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yes and POTUS believes that Tylenol causes Autism. Just because leaders believe something doesn’t make it true.

              • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                16
                ·
                1 day ago

                So you don’t believe Jews used to inhabit Israel, despite the evidence? They do have a valid reason for making a claim to the land, which is entirely different from your example

                • F_State@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  Jewish people have more current claim to Brooklyn than they do to the land that corresponds to ancient Israel and Judea.

                • mrdown@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  When your ancestors lives in another continent for centuries you lose your connection and can’t have any claim or force a state on the local population . The ancestry argument is very stupid

                • Sonicdemon86@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  No I believe that they were originally from that spot between Egypt and Israel until they moved to Egypt and then to Israel after they committed genocide and killing the people that lived there before them. Then they got booted out of Israel and lived other places. They have less claim to the land than the people that were there in the 1800s. Have you not read the Bible?

          • FishFace@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            1 day ago

            Sounds like you want revenge colonialism.

            It’s nice to see that you and Israel can agree on the desirability of a forever war and ethnic cleansing…

            • mrdown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              We want a one state solution because thanks to Israel fault of building illegal settlements a two state solution is no longer possible . Nobody advocate for kicking out all Israeli from the land

              • FishFace@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                A two state solution is still possible. Israel kicked all the settlers out of Gaza once, and it can be done with other settlements too. It’s only infeasible because no country that matters is willing to stand up to Netanyahu in a way that matters. But without doing that, there’s also no way to enact whatever counter-genocide it is you’re advocating.

                • mrdown@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  There was only 9000 settlers in Gaza. Here we are talking about 700k . Israel will probably do the same with Arabs and will be transferred to the new state which will be in a such economical weakness .

                  counter-genocide it is you’re advocating.

                  I said i advocate for a white state solution with equal rights so nobody is going to be genocide or ethnically cleansing stop being disingenuous

        • biofaust@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          A colonial project is not a human. Neither is a country btw, but that’s not what we are talking about here anyway.

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 days ago

    Really wish the UN had some kind of method to stop counties from clearly and openly committing genocide

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s called war, but it’s not very popular, especially when waged with no economic incentives. Just look at how many Europeans complain about sending help to Ukraine, not even troops.