So, starting now, Google started mandating full JS for YT, effectively breaking all third-party clients and locking the site to their official client.

This reeks of DRM.

UPDATE: Installing Deno and installing yt-dlp through PyPi fixes yt-dlp but the very idea that Google is mandating JS to lock down YT in an attempt at pseudo-DRM is still crappy.

UPDATE #2: inv.nadeko.net is working again for now.

  • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    I have a program for download yt stuff, will that also break being a full program or is it going to have the same flaw?

        • DFX4509B@lemmy.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          Tartube uses yt-dlp, until Google implements real DRM ala Widevine on YT, which I fully expect them to if they’re locking things down this drastically, I mentioned how you can get yt-dlp working again-for now.

          • forrgott@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            I actually doubt it will go that far. They’re far more concerned with those precious ad views, and the slowdown from encrypting/decrypting every feed everywhere would almost certainly cause a noticeable downward trend in those ad views.

            • DFX4509B@lemmy.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              4 days ago

              It’s Google, I wouldn’t trust them any further than I can throw their Pixel phones. They straight-up admitted recently to breaking the open web, they’ll do anything.

                • DFX4509B@lemmy.orgOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  It’s a figure of speech to mean you don’t trust something or someone’s products.

                  • Kernal64@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    I’m aware, but usually people use something large and heavy as their example of the thing to be thrown, because they wouldn’t be able to throw it far. The short or non-existent throw distance acts as a metaphor for the lack of trust. For example, I wouldn’t trust Google farther than I can throw one of their servers. Those clowns are absolutely not to be trusted.

              • forrgott@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Fair enough. I mean, they’ll never not pay attention to whatever moves the money, of course. Brrr! Line most go up! But they’re so far up their own asses who really knows why they do what they do. Cause I’m pretty sure the only thing they’ve figured out is what their own farts smell like!