The deal is:
When CSAM is a thing, a child has already been violated.
When conversation is being controlled, government or whoever reads all of your messages.
It means cops can CSAM you, and you can do nothing since cops are “protected people”
Bad article, but the point does stand: breaking encryption is stupid, and csam is just an excuse, nothing more, no politician gives a shit about kids
Fuck reading a website that upts a popup that puts a rant about my hardware across 1/4 of their content
I like how the website doesn’t even work anymore.
seems to work fine
Let me guess, you got the iWarning? lol
How fucking distasteful is that cover of the article
The images of the kid from E.T.?
Wtf I hadn’t even noticed it 😡
This was, logically, a very badly written article. If anything, reading this article steers me towards breaking encryption, a position I would never take.
Please explain
i’m sure the kids who were abused would say otherwise
Encryption doesn’t abuse kids; pedophiles do. There’re plenty of documented ones in office actually voting for the removal of your (human) rights to privacy.
As a person who was sexually abused as a child, please have the courage to state your opinions without using abused kids as a logical crutch.
Encryption abused them?
Removing encryption is opening a Pandora’s box that won’t protect real victims for even a second.
victims need privacy and secure communication indeed
