• bryndos
    link
    fedilink
    127 days ago

    Interested to know how much less for lower resolutions. I’m not sure I’ve ever cared for high resolutions - and I’d always pick more battery life given the choice.

    • As long as the GPU is halfway reasonable the resolution of the video has very little impact on power draw. Most of the power draw is the screen, and the fact that the CPU and GPU are active. That’s one of the reasons why Intels core 100 series and up have the LP E cores in a separate tile from the regular E and P cores.

    • @sga@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 days ago

      on my laptop (specs wise - consider steam deck non oled, but worse graphics performance, 1080p screen (IPS)) - 5.3-6 Wh for 2x speed playback. for full hd playback 6-7 Wh. Idle power is much higher though 4.5 Wh, on my old laptop, video power consumption consumed similar power, but idle power was close to 2.5-3 Wh (in terms of specs, it had halve the number of cores, and a tn panel)

      • @dgdft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 days ago

        Can I save a lot of battery by choosing 1080 instead of 2/4k for laptops in general?

        Yes. What your link states is that running a 4k monitor at 1080p won’t save you power (it will, but via gpu, not monitor draw).

        A 1080p monitor will require substantially less power than a 4k monitor, all other factors held equal.

        • @Cypher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          36 days ago

          ARM is more power efficient and so are OLED screens so it wouldn’t shock me if the apple silicon macbooks are significantly lower power draw.

          Finding a good 1 to 1 comparison is difficult though so I can’t say for sure.

    • To repost any and all content from a .ml sub, regardless if the needed context is added or not. Because they don’t crosspost properly you can’t see the other comments with the needed context.