• @theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4213 days ago

      Yeah, I don’t know why we glorify military service. It’s just exploiting people to enforce exploitation overseas at this point

      But even aside from that, I feel like this is in bad taste… They just finished fucking over all the trans people in the military. The tone is like telling someone “you’re welcome here” as they’re lying there after being thrown out

      It’s like saying “well, I believe you’re an American” as they’re put on the plane. Just doesn’t seem like the right thing to say in that moment

      • LousyCornMuffins
        link
        fedilink
        English
        413 days ago

        I don’t know why we glorify military service

        Because we should glorify service to the people, and service to the state can be and sometimes is an abstract a form of that. Same reason we pay teachers in pats on the back instead of money.

          • LousyCornMuffins
            link
            fedilink
            English
            212 days ago

            Previously yes. They used to get deployed around here to help in natural emergencies. Fires, floods, landslides, stuff like that. Currently, cannot speak to whether they do.

        • @theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          112 days ago

          We don’t glorify service to the state in any other way though. We look down on public servants.

          And military service is the biggest gulf between service to the people and service to the state… It doesn’t help the people at all, it only serves the state

          • @ILoveUnions@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            112 days ago

            … It doesn’t help the people at all, it only serves the state

            Depends on your state’s situation. USA, yes. Somewhere like south korea, no

            • @theneverfox@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              112 days ago

              It’s also definitely true for South Korea, or Ukraine

              Just… In these cases, the state is much more aligned with the people. Service to the state means protecting the people

              This is just not common. This is an exception

          • @cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            713 days ago

            While its true in an ideal world there would be no militaries and no war

            Unfortunately, we do not live in that world, any country that doesn’t have a, or is under the protection of another’s, military will be taken advantage of sooner or later.

            There are many hostile countries in this world

            • qaz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              713 days ago

              True, but the USA has been the instigator in many cases. Was invading Iraq really necessary?

              • @cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                513 days ago

                No, but that’s just criticism or condemnation of specific actions taken by a certain military, which should always be done.

                But condemning a country just for having a military is what’s silly

    • KSP Atlas
      link
      fedilink
      612 days ago

      having pronouns for dead/no longer existent things in English would be kinda interesting though

      Is there a language that does this actually