• Diplomjodler
    link
    fedilink
    -61 day ago

    Time for a successor, though. Sometimes I think Valve really doesn’t like money. They could make a crapton by bringing out a new Steam Deck and a Steam console.

    • @mercano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      71 day ago

      It’s a PC, essentially, so the hardware is always evolving, they could upgrade whenever they choose to. The advantage of any console, the Steam Deck included, is it offers a very consistent set of specs the developers can target for years. If Valve iterates too quickly, then two problems arise: One, there’s one performance goal for devs interested in making a portable game to work towards, there’s many. In addition, the Steam Deck Verified program gets a lot harder to maintain if there are too many flavors of Deck to manage. I think Valve is planing on a lifecycle similar to the major consoles.

      The upside is it is all PC hardware, and there are other handheld manufacturers out there, some even running SteamOS, so if you want a higher performance rig before Valve’s ready for the SD2, you can certainly find what you’re looking for.

      • Diplomjodler
        link
        fedilink
        -21 day ago

        The steam deck is getting long in the tooth and will increasingly have trouble playing newer titles. In PC gaming, you can’t have console-like product cycles.

        • Shirasho
          link
          fedilink
          71 day ago

          I would argue the Steam Deck was never really meant to target the newest and greatest.

            • @zergtoshi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 day ago

              Maybe outdated for future CPU and GPU hungry games.
              The same emulators that run now will continue to do so as will very likely indie titles.
              In the end it depends on what you want to do with the SD.