The term “AI” was established in 1956 at the Dartmouth workshop and covers a very broad range of topics in computer science. It definitely encompasses large language models.
I am sure llm is a little part of AI won’t deny it. But that sold as is their are a full ai. Which isnt true.
I wasn’t born in 1956 my définition of ai is Jarvis :D
Thing is, to the people who don’t follow tech news and aren’t really interested in this stuff, AI = AGI. It’s like most non-scientists equating “theory” and “hypothesis”. So it’s a really bad choice of term that’s interfering with communication.
The term “AI” was established in 1956 at the Dartmouth workshop and covers a very broad range of topics in computer science. It definitely encompasses large language models.
I am sure llm is a little part of AI won’t deny it. But that sold as is their are a full ai. Which isnt true. I wasn’t born in 1956 my définition of ai is Jarvis :D
You are mistaking a specific kind of AI for all AI. That’s like saying a tulip isn’t a flower because you believe flowers are roses.
Jarvis is a fictional example of a kind of AI known as Artificial General Intelligence, or AGI.
Thing is, to the people who don’t follow tech news and aren’t really interested in this stuff, AI = AGI. It’s like most non-scientists equating “theory” and “hypothesis”. So it’s a really bad choice of term that’s interfering with communication.
This community where we’re discussing this right now is literally intended for following tech news. It is for people who follow tech news.
Okey, so gate keeping. I will stop here. Enjoy your day bye.