• @Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    -48 days ago

    You still need to present evidence, in court, before you can throw someone in (or under) prison. Or do you think Trump is right by arguing that he shouldn’t have to follow due process against HIS targets? The law should be equally applied to everyone…so, if you think it’s ok to simply ignore the process for him, then anyone can simply ignore the process for others.

    Guilt by decree is not “justice”.

    • Zoot
      link
      fedilink
      78 days ago

      If anyone else was a 34 time convicted felon they would be spending life without parole in jail.

      But do go on about how the law is definitely working, and does affect the rich.

      • @Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        -28 days ago

        I’m not saying the system is perfect. There’s no such thing as a perfect system. But throwing away the entire concept of due process, just because rich people have the advantage of hiring better lawyers, is not the answer.

        There are definitely ways to reform the system to make it more equitable…but skipping the parts where evidence is required for a conviction, or closing all possibilities for appeals? No. All that does is give people like Trump the perfect weapon to use against their enemies. None of us are safe, if we abandon those foundational principles.

          • @Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            -17 days ago

            It still needs to be presented in court, and debated in front of a judge and jury. That way, it’s all on the record.

            • amorpheus
              link
              fedilink
              17 days ago

              None of that is happening. And SCOTUS ruled that the president is immune regarding any “official” actions.