Pro to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish • 11 days agoRustprogramming.devimagemessage-square100fedilinkarrow-up1939arrow-down145
arrow-up1894arrow-down1imageRustprogramming.devPro to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish • 11 days agomessage-square100fedilink
minus-square@Croquette@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink8•10 days agoI interface with low level communication protocols, mostly uart, so it fits my use case. But it is nice to see the hurdles people encounters. It tells a lot about the language.
minus-square@brucethemoose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink5•edit-210 days agoYeah. I wasn’t trying to imply it’s a bad language at all; it just fits certain use cases. They are complex, like people. Still, it seems like it’d be cool for engine work, with C# or maybe a subset of typed Python as a scripting language.
I interface with low level communication protocols, mostly uart, so it fits my use case. But it is nice to see the hurdles people encounters. It tells a lot about the language.
Yeah. I wasn’t trying to imply it’s a bad language at all; it just fits certain use cases. They are complex, like people.
Still, it seems like it’d be cool for engine work, with C# or maybe a subset of typed Python as a scripting language.