@afk_strats@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish • 12 days agoInspired by a Lemmy postlemmy.worldimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1817arrow-down15
arrow-up1812arrow-down1imageInspired by a Lemmy postlemmy.world@afk_strats@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish • 12 days agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-square@SapphironZA@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink4•edit-212 days agoFront loading bays though. Most 3.5 inch drives go in top loading bays. Do they looking like modern 3.5inch drives, or older ones?
minus-squareDr. WeskerlinkfedilinkEnglish3•12 days agoThere are a number of chassis that have front loading 3.5" bays. I have one at home. Looking at the pic, each chassis looks to be 3U. I’d bet money those are 3.5".
minus-square@SapphironZA@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink2•11 days agoWhat I meant, is that they are not commonly used anymore, because of how expensive rackspace and power has become in commercial settings.
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 linkfedilinkEnglish1•12 days agoI’d have to see the connection ports… IDE, SATA, and SCSI drives all look the same unless it’s one of the 5 inch drives that afaik only ever were SCSI.
Those look like 3.5" drives.
Front loading bays though. Most 3.5 inch drives go in top loading bays. Do they looking like modern 3.5inch drives, or older ones?
There are a number of chassis that have front loading 3.5" bays. I have one at home.
Looking at the pic, each chassis looks to be 3U. I’d bet money those are 3.5".
What I meant, is that they are not commonly used anymore, because of how expensive rackspace and power has become in commercial settings.
I’d have to see the connection ports… IDE, SATA, and SCSI drives all look the same unless it’s one of the 5 inch drives that afaik only ever were SCSI.