• @markko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    516 days ago

    I agree with the other response - I don’t care about my meat sack once it’s no longer operational. Harvest my useful organs for donation, then feed the rest to the kitties.

    The difference between humans and other animals is that we understand the concept of death and can make our post-life wishes known.

    If my children told me they wanted to be fed to the tigers I’d probably still be horrified by the image of it but I wouldn’t push back.

    Our pets can’t communicate their wishes to us, and in all likelihood they don’t care what happens to them when they’re dead. Putting their meat to some kind of use seems far more ethical to me than turning it into ash or sticking it in the ground.

    • @Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      115 days ago

      It’s not about what happens to the body, if it was “bring us your dead pets we will feed them to tigers”, I wouldn’t be against it. I fundamentally disagree with the idea of surrendering your pet to be killed, be it a kill-shelter, or a zoo.

      • @Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 days ago

        but that’s the humane thing to do, it’s not cool to force the animal to suffer from disease or old age until their bodies give out…

        like, this is standard practice, you put your pets down when they’re too sick to live worthy lives.