@ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 19 days agoInheritancelemmy.curiana.netimagemessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up11.27Karrow-down15
arrow-up11.27Karrow-down1imageInheritancelemmy.curiana.net@ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 19 days agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-square@zqwzzle@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish47•19 days agoHence the roundabout route I guess. Programmers really should stop using it. https://xkcd.com/583/
minus-square@bitchkat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•18 days agoFor some reason, COBOL has had OOP features since 2002.
minus-square@marcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink6•18 days ago For some reason It’s because “every language must do OOP”. Every SQL engine does it… SWI Prolog seems to have escaped, but COBOL had no chance.
I didn’t think COBOL had inheritance.
Hence the roundabout route I guess. Programmers really should stop using it. https://xkcd.com/583/
Carlos!
For some reason, COBOL has had OOP features since 2002.
It’s because “every language must do OOP”.
Every SQL engine does it… SWI Prolog seems to have escaped, but COBOL had no chance.