User used the same db for prod and dev, user has no backup, LLM with db access is deleting it, user interacts with the LLM like it’s a human and ask it to apologize and follow promises of not doing it……
Oh and user doesn’t use git or any code linting/control.
But yeah it is the llm fault /s
What is scary is this is the tip of the iceberg. I foresee a lot of security problems in the future if software development goes that way.
He actually did have a backup, because the company is only normal-stupid and not deliberate-stupid, they had a DB checkpoint he could roll back to.
The LLM, of course, went with the path of least resistance once it started down the “oh no I fucked up” completion prompt, and claimed they had no such checkpoint.
User used the same db for prod and dev, user has no backup, LLM with db access is deleting it, user interacts with the LLM like it’s a human and ask it to apologize and follow promises of not doing it…… Oh and user doesn’t use git or any code linting/control.
But yeah it is the llm fault /s What is scary is this is the tip of the iceberg. I foresee a lot of security problems in the future if software development goes that way.
He actually did have a backup, because the company is only normal-stupid and not deliberate-stupid, they had a DB checkpoint he could roll back to.
The LLM, of course, went with the path of least resistance once it started down the “oh no I fucked up” completion prompt, and claimed they had no such checkpoint.
Don’t use LLM for fact things, kids.