@axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 month agoWhich git branch are you on?locklemmy.cafeimagemessage-square139fedilinkarrow-up1415arrow-down117
arrow-up1398arrow-down1imageWhich git branch are you on?locklemmy.cafe@axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square139fedilink
minus-squareDerpgonlinkfedilink19•edit-21 month agoWhy not change “walkie talkie” to “radio phone”? It is so much cleaner. Because change for the sake of change always brings more work than what it saves. Why change something that works and everyone recognizes it? Of course, if this debate was there when the standard was created…
minus-square@Lembot_0004@discuss.onlinelinkfedilink5•1 month agoBecause it is a historically settled down terminology that everyone understands and there is no adequate reason to change it.
minus-square@PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink7•1 month ago everyone understands no, new people learn git every day. ‘main’ is much clearer. It’s maybe not the same readability gain as ‘blocklist/allowlist’ over ‘blacklist/whitelist’, but it’s still there.
minus-square@PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink3•1 month agowe should make the empty string the name for the default branch
Why master? main is much clearer
Why not change “walkie talkie” to “radio phone”? It is so much cleaner.
Because change for the sake of change always brings more work than what it saves.
Why change something that works and everyone recognizes it? Of course, if this debate was there when the standard was created…
Because it is a historically settled down terminology that everyone understands and there is no adequate reason to change it.
no, new people learn git every day.
‘main’ is much clearer. It’s maybe not the same readability gain as ‘blocklist/allowlist’ over ‘blacklist/whitelist’, but it’s still there.
Why main? m is much clearer
we should make the empty string the name for the default branch