Pope Leo XIV on Monday called for the release of imprisoned journalists and affirmed the “precious gift of free speech and the press” in an audience with some of the 6,000 journalists who descended on Rome to cover his election as the first American pontiff.
Is this not literally what he did though?
https://www.ifj.org/media-centre/news/detail/article/ninety-four-journalists-killed-in-2023-says-ifj
https://www.ifj.org/media-centre/news/detail/article/104-journalists-killed-this-year-according-to-the-ifj
That is why Pope Leo XIV would speak directly speak about the Palestinian Genocide if he truly cared about journalism and the protection of it and the people who practice it.
Labelling it ‘Middle East and Arab World’ is so fucking disingenuous when it’s Israeli scum butchering journalists. For decades now.
I’m directing this at whomever made the diagram specifically. They can fuck off with that misdirection crap.
So, blatant inaccuracies aside, this doesn’t change the fact that he quite literally did speak up about it, well before your toddler-esque “if he doesn’t say exactly this then he’s against us” rant.
The fact that he said something to begin with is already a step in the right direction. What you’re asking is unrealistic.
I never said this was a binary choice, or that he was against Palestinians, just that this it is cowardly to not mention the genocide where a historic amount of journalists are being killed.
Why precisely is it unrealistic?