The bill contains many provisions legal experts say are likely unconstitutional, including one that says it can’t be challenged in state court.
The bill contains many provisions legal experts say are likely unconstitutional, including one that says it can’t be challenged in state court.
lmao the audacity to try and put a “This law can’t be challenged in court” provision in.
If only the woke globalist DEImocrats had thought to put “no takebacksies” in the language of roe v wade 🤦♂️
It simply follows the “I am rubber you are glue” act of 1993.
Not to be that guy but
I am rubber you are glue was in ‘92
All for me none for thee was in ‘93
When was fuck you got mine then? I thought that was ‘93?
That was actually codified in '99 but had been part of judicial and legislative norms for years prior
That is just the Calvin ball handbook
Kinda like a court saying “This ruling is so bad it only applies in this case and can’t be used as precedent in future cases.”
HEYWAITAMINUTE
Like how USA got Bush/Cheney at the helm?
Exactly like how USA got Bush/Cheney at the helm!
We really do elect the dumbest fucks in the bunch.
This law can’t be challenged in court times infinity.