• Geetnerd
      link
      fedilink
      English
      312 hours ago

      He was one of the richest Americans who ever lived. I don’t if that is still true, but it was at one time.

    • @Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      So, he could have paid other guys to fight the war and stayed home? Instead of being in the middle of the battles, and going cold and hungry in Valley Forge?

      There’s a lot of bad things you can say about Washington but enough good to at least make him complicated. He chose to limit his own Presidency, the opposite of our wannabe Führer. for one.

      • @StaticFalconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        11 hour ago

        The modern technology of satelites, phones and such werent around back then, so any general wouldn’t be an effective one if they werent on the front lines with their soldiers.

      • Geetnerd
        link
        fedilink
        English
        412 hours ago

        Yes, he was filthy rich, not in liquidity, but in assets.

        But yes, he was approached with the offer to be King of The Colonies, and he refused. We can admire that.

      • @barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        917 hours ago

        Well, his wealth wasn’t exactly liquid, it was mostly tied up in wilderness land.

        Fortunes in those days weren’t in bank accounts, or stocks, or index funds, etc. They tended to be tied up in assets like land, slaves, crops, etc., and cold hard cash/gold, stored in a box somewhere, like under the floor.