• Geetnerd
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 hours ago

        He was one of the richest Americans who ever lived. I don’t if that is still true, but it was at one time.

      • @Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        14
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        So, he could have paid other guys to fight the war and stayed home? Instead of being in the middle of the battles, and going cold and hungry in Valley Forge?

        There’s a lot of bad things you can say about Washington but enough good to at least make him complicated. He chose to limit his own Presidency, the opposite of our wannabe Führer. for one.

        • @StaticFalconar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          140 minutes ago

          The modern technology of satelites, phones and such werent around back then, so any general wouldn’t be an effective one if they werent on the front lines with their soldiers.

        • Geetnerd
          link
          fedilink
          English
          411 hours ago

          Yes, he was filthy rich, not in liquidity, but in assets.

          But yes, he was approached with the offer to be King of The Colonies, and he refused. We can admire that.

        • @barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          916 hours ago

          Well, his wealth wasn’t exactly liquid, it was mostly tied up in wilderness land.

          Fortunes in those days weren’t in bank accounts, or stocks, or index funds, etc. They tended to be tied up in assets like land, slaves, crops, etc., and cold hard cash/gold, stored in a box somewhere, like under the floor.