@abhi9u@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 4 months agoPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.comexternal-linkmessage-square149fedilinkarrow-up1220arrow-down122cross-posted to: python@programming.dev
arrow-up1198arrow-down1external-linkPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.com@abhi9u@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 4 months agomessage-square149fedilinkcross-posted to: python@programming.dev
minus-square@catloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish3•4 months agoYou can make that assumption at your own peril.
minus-square@WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish4•4 months agoI don’t think they are a minority
minus-squareAvicennacakelinkfedilinkEnglish3•4 months agoIf anything len tells you that it is a sequence or a collection, “not” does not tell you that. That I feel like is the main point of my objection.
You can make that assumption at your own peril.
I don’t think they are a minority
If anything len tells you that it is a sequence or a collection, “not” does not tell you that. That I feel like is the main point of my objection.