@abhi9u@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 18 days agoPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.comexternal-linkmessage-square150fedilinkarrow-up1219arrow-down122cross-posted to: python@programming.dev
arrow-up1197arrow-down1external-linkPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.com@abhi9u@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 18 days agomessage-square150fedilinkcross-posted to: python@programming.dev
minus-square@catloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish3•18 days agoYou can make that assumption at your own peril.
minus-square@WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish4•18 days agoI don’t think they are a minority
minus-square@iAvicenna@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•18 days agoIf anything len tells you that it is a sequence or a collection, “not” does not tell you that. That I feel like is the main point of my objection.
You can make that assumption at your own peril.
I don’t think they are a minority
If anything len tells you that it is a sequence or a collection, “not” does not tell you that. That I feel like is the main point of my objection.