• @kitnaht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      221 month ago

      That’s probably the only reason I clicked it. Honestly, kinda regret that I did because the author just seems like a dude yelling at the sky because he’s wildly critical of the smallest things but doesn’t offer up any solutions.

      • Smee
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        So you’re disappoint it wasn’t a rickroll of the original image?

          • @kitnaht@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I (wrongly) assumed that if he was hilarious to have made that graphic, that he’d maybe be more reasonable, hopefully funny. I was disappoint.

            It did kick off me spending about 2 hours comparing Signal to SimpleX, and Briar, and a bunch of others, and I can only conclude Signal is the best out of them. The security community seems to be REALLY paranoid about every, single, tiny little thing - but I understand that they must be.

            SimpleX doesn’t do any kind of IP address masking or have quantum resistant double ratchet encryption.

            Briar doesn’t account for rogue-tor nodes, etc.

            There’s just always some big glaring flaw in one of them.

      • @Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        41 month ago

        Yeah everyone likes to call it “Goat-see” or “Goat-say”, but it was originally supposed to be “goat-secx” i.e. “goat sex”.

        • @Poop@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I think part of the confusion may be that when the site was taken down, the mirrors that sprung up were things like goat.se, etc.

          I’ve heard it pronounced “goatsee” and said that myself back when the original site was live. You are 100% right on the intent of the name though.