• flamingos-cant
    link
    fedilink
    English
    723 months ago

    There are plenty of things that are ‘natural’ that are wrong to do, why is eating meat any different?

      • @Carnelian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        443 months ago

        That misses the question a bit, no? Everything that is wrong to do is a personal choice. It’s not relevant to whether or not it should be done

        • @Soulg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          -8
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Not really, some things are objectively bad and wrong and other things are merely subjective.

          The problem we’re having here are people who hold their subjective beliefs very strongly are then adamant that it makes said beliefs objective, just because they believe them.

          • toomanypancakes
            link
            fedilink
            English
            273 months ago

            Killing someone who’s done nothing to you and doesn’t want to die is pretty objectively bad.

            • @Soulg@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              -53 months ago

              There is none. It’s just my view based on how people see things. You’re allowed to not agree, it doesn’t have to be combative.

          • @Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            33 months ago

            even things like killing being bad is not objective in my opinion, it just simply stems from our minds and societies’ process of growth through natural selection.

            We believe that killing is bad only because we share the majority of their DNA and we are close genetically to what we’re killing. It was evolutionarily incentivised to not kill those that are genetically close, as they and we share common ancestors from which such thoughts evolved.

            this is imo why we value humans more than other animals, animals more than vegetables and relatives over strangers. Friends being valued more than strangers make sense as well, as they share ideas in the place of the shared genome.

            in a wider scope none of this matters anyway, our lives and deaths are irrelevant to the universe and our lives don’t actually matter outside what our minds tell us.

            • @Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              13 months ago

              Just to clarify I’m not saying that we should go around killing people, just that objectivity isn’t real in morality

      • @starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        33 months ago

        See this is what I told people when they found out I had sex with my dog, and they said I was crazy and abusive! Like, it’s my own choice!

        • @starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          33 months ago

          >inb4 some child left behind replies with “are you equating eating meat for sustenance with rape?”

          Yes. You could eat something else for sustenance. The reason you choose meat is because it’s a more enjoyable experience for you, despite the inherent harm. That sounds similar to another topic I mentioned in this comment

    • @shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -233 months ago

      Homosexuality has been observed among a great many species, particularly birds and mammals.

      What where we talking about again?

      • flamingos-cant
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Killing and eating your children has been observed among a great many species, particularly reptiles and mammals.

        What where we talking about again?

      • @starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        53 months ago

        What were you hoping to achieve with this? You sure showed them, not all natural activities are bad. Unfortunately, they didn’t say that. You’re arguing against nobody