• The Menemen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Why? There are commisions for that. E.g. the United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names (international), the United States Board on Geographic Names (USA) or the Permanent Committee on Geographical Names (UK). Just follow the lead of one of these. There is no need to further complicate stuff.

      • The Menemen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        What the hell is “the ground rule”? Naming is artificially defining things and as that basically arbitrary.

          • The Menemen
            link
            fedilink
            English
            53 months ago

            How would that even fit here? If the US changes the name there would be two names that fit that description (which isn’t uncommon at all tbh).

            • @infeeeee@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              73 months ago

              On osm there is one main attribute name, and other secondary names like alt_name, loc_name, official_name, etc, and different language versions of all of them e.g. name:en, name:es etc… This is not a political question, but technical, how it should be recorded according to the osm tagging scheme, how this rare situation should be mapped, it’s not straightforward. More info in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

          • Xavienth
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            Yeah lemme just get on a boat in the Gulf and look for signs showing its name