• @GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -388 months ago

    Way to miss the point there buddy. Don’t interfere with regular civilians is the point. Absolutely, disrupt businesses if that’s the point of your protest. Look at the BLM protests as an example. They blocked out large swathes of roads so that no one would be able to enter. They didn’t disturb those who were already driving.

    Also, no one says the protest has to be small. Press exists for a reason.

    • @Saurok@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      308 months ago

      The entire point of a protest is to disrupt and inconvenience people, including civilians. Protests have no teeth otherwise.

        • ✺roguetrick✺
          link
          fedilink
          English
          78 months ago

          You’re the one arguing that direct action should neither be direct or action.

          • @GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -58 months ago

            Way to misrepresent my argument there buddy. I’m saying that it can still be direct without inconveniencing civilians going about their day, but most of you Lemmy liberals are too chaotic. Enjoy alienating potential supporters of your cause then.

            • ✺roguetrick✺
              link
              fedilink
              English
              58 months ago

              I’m not a liberal. Liberal’s prime justification for sticking with the status quo certainly is that they’re “alienated”, though. That’s not the actual reason of course. The actual reason is they’re fat and happy on the current system and don’t want radical change. That’s the benefit of creating pain points, so it’s not so easy to ignore.