• @PoopingCough@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6510 months ago

      I don’t disagree with your overall point, but statistics like that are almost always heavily skewed because of high infant mortality rates

      • snooggums
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2410 months ago

        The mortality rate during childbirth was pretty high for women on top of the infant rate. Childbirth as a whole dragged the numbers down.

        • @psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          510 months ago

          The mortality of mothers only became a big issue between doctors being in charge of birth and hand washing becoming a rule

          • @tetris11@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 months ago

            The domestication of storks has also led to fewer deaths upon delivery. I wish to also add something to this thread of reddit factoids.

      • @Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        18th century france is also quite possibly the single worst place and point in time to use as a comparison, there’s a reason people beheaded monarchs.

    • @RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1410 months ago

      A reminder that life expectancy in ancient history was so low not because people generally croaked by 40, but because of how many children died young.

      It’s an average, not a maximum. People regularly lived into their 70s and 80s hundreds of years ago.

      • @Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        From what i’ve read and heard about the subject, the life expectancy generally looked something like this back in the hunter-gatherer days:

        You were very likely to die as an infant, pretty likely to die before puberty, after that you were likely to make it to 40-50, and it wasn’t that rare to reach 70.