@TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldimagemessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1419arrow-down124
arrow-up1395arrow-down1imageSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.world@TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square90fedilink
minus-square@Miaou@jlai.lulinkfedilink5•1 year agoWith such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
minus-squareEthanlinkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoSo you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?
With such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
So you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?