@nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 2 years agoPalworld down 1.3m players in Steam’s biggest-ever two-week dropwww.pcgamesn.commessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up1100arrow-down140
arrow-up160arrow-down1external-linkPalworld down 1.3m players in Steam’s biggest-ever two-week dropwww.pcgamesn.com@nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square68fedilink
minus-square@EatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish-19•2 years agoIt’s absolutely 100% part of the reason why I interpreted it the way it was meant to be interpreted.
minus-square@Sethayy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish14•2 years agoThe best part of interpretation is how objective it is eh? /s
minus-square@EatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish-9•2 years agoI cant believe people are actually arguing that the top level poster wasn’t implying that this article is claiming that palworld failing.
minus-square@EatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish-7•edit-22 years agoI would rather something matter too much to me than be dishonest.
minus-squarePepsilinkfedilink5•edit-22 years ago🙄 Weird to get self-righteous about your inability to understand clear sarcasm
minus-square@EatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish-7•2 years agoAgain, my response took the sarcasm into account. Its more likely that you don’t understand the sarcasm.
minus-squarePepsilinkfedilink1•2 years agoi mean sure, maybe i don’t get it on the level you do. maybe nobody here has such a refined sense of taste in humor as you. but that doesn’t excuse you being a whiny bitch about it.
You missed the ‘/s’ for sarcasm, didn’t you?
It’s absolutely 100% part of the reason why I interpreted it the way it was meant to be interpreted.
The best part of interpretation is how objective it is eh?
/s
I cant believe people are actually arguing that the top level poster wasn’t implying that this article is claiming that palworld failing.
i can’t believe it matters this much to you
I would rather something matter too much to me than be dishonest.
🙄
Weird to get self-righteous about your inability to understand clear sarcasm
Again, my response took the sarcasm into account. Its more likely that you don’t understand the sarcasm.
i mean sure, maybe i don’t get it on the level you do. maybe nobody here has such a refined sense of taste in humor as you.
but that doesn’t excuse you being a whiny bitch about it.