@nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 2 years agoStarfield is now mostly negative in recent reviewsstore.steampowered.comexternal-linkmessage-square262fedilinkarrow-up1597arrow-down133
arrow-up1564arrow-down1external-linkStarfield is now mostly negative in recent reviewsstore.steampowered.com@nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square262fedilink
minus-square@Honytawk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglish-1•2 years agoYou can hate on it all you want, even say the game was boring and bland. But the way they did New Game + was very innovative.
minus-square@merthyr1831@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•2 years agoYou have to complete the game to even play the New Game +, dont think that’s what got them the nomination
minus-square@GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoThat’s like a film winning an award based on the director’s cut
minus-square@merthyr1831@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•2 years agoA directors cut you cant even watch until you watch the regular cut that no one cares for
minus-squareWilliamlinkfedilinkEnglish4•2 years agoI thought that was a good idea, and I’m a huge fan of timeloops… But so much of the rest was poorly done that after a couple loops, you stop wanting to loop.
You can hate on it all you want, even say the game was boring and bland.
But the way they did New Game + was very innovative.
You have to complete the game to even play the New Game +, dont think that’s what got them the nomination
That’s like a film winning an award based on the director’s cut
A directors cut you cant even watch until you watch the regular cut that no one cares for
I thought that was a good idea, and I’m a huge fan of timeloops… But so much of the rest was poorly done that after a couple loops, you stop wanting to loop.
True that idea was definitely cool